×
Home
Current Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article

CD4:CD8 Ratio: A Valuable Diagnostic Parameter for Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

By
Arda Kiani ,
Ian M. Adcock ,
Ian M. Adcock
Kimia Taghavi ,
Kimia Taghavi
Esmaeil Mortaz ,
Esmaeil Mortaz
Atosa Doroudinia ,
Atosa Doroudinia
Seyed Reza Seyedi ,
Seyed Reza Seyedi
Mehdi Kazempour-Dizaji ,
Mehdi Kazempour-Dizaji
Atefeh Abedini
Atefeh Abedini

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ disease and is characterized by sarcoidal noncaseating granuloma comprised of T-helper/inducer (CD4+) lymphocytes and scant cytotoxic (CD8+) T-lymphocytes. CD4+:CD8+ T-cell elevated ratio is a characteristic diagnostic parameter for sarcoidosis. This is the first report from Iran evaluating the CD4:CD8 ratio capability in differentiating pulmonary sarcoidosis from other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) on a large cohort. Fifty pulmonary sarcoidosis patients and 50 non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases (nsILDs) patients were included in the current study. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed using flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and flow cytometer. Non-sarcoidosis group was established by 50 components that were classified into eight subgroups.  Fifty-two per cent of sarcoidosis patients and 62% of non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung disease patients had normal spirometric results. The CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly higher in sarcoidosis than in non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases (p < 0.001). The CD4/CD8 ratio was found to be > 3.5 in 33.3%, 2.5–3.5 in 7.1%, 1.5–2.5 in 20.2% and < 1.5 in 39.4% of the entire study population. The best cut off point was 1.1 with the sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 80% for distinguishing sarcoidosis from other interstitial lung diseases. Performing bronchoalveolar lavage as the safe and rapid first step confirms the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in 92% of cases (current study sensitivity). Hence, performing an invasive procedure was required in a few patients only.
Bronchoalveolar lavage flow cytometry in the assessment of clinical and radiological findings supplies an appropriate diagnostic adjunct for discriminating sarcoidosis from non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases.

References

1.
Ziegenhagen MW, Rothe ME, Schlaak M, Müller-Quernheim J. Bronchoalveolar and serological parameters reflecting the severity of sarcoidosis. European Respiratory Journal. 2003;21(3):407–13.
2.
Tanrıverdi H, Uygur F, Örnek T. Comparison of the diagnostic value of different lymphocyte sub-populations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pati-ents with biopsy proven sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2016;32:305–12.
3.
Costabel U, Bonella F, Ohshimo S, Guzman J. Diagnostic Modalities in Sarcoidosis: BAL, EBUS, and PET. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2010;31(04):404–8.
4.
Kantrow S, Meyer K, Kidd P, Raghu G. The CD4/CD8 ratio in BAL fluid is highly variable in sarcoidosis. European Respiratory Journal. 1997;10(12):2716–21.
5.
Bakhshayesh-Karam M, Tabarsi P, Mirsaiedi SM, Amiri MV, Zahirifard S, Mansoori SD, et al. Radiographic manifestations of Tuberculosis in HIV positive patients: Correlation with CD4+ T-cell count. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2016;5:S244–5.
6.
Kojima K, Maruyama K, Inaba T, Nagata K, Yasuhara T, Yoneda K, et al. The CD4/CD8 Ratio in Vitreous Fluid Is of High Diagnostic Value in Sarcoidosis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(11):2386–92.
7.
Mortaz E, Masjedi MR, Abedini A, Matroodi S, Kiani A, Soroush D, et al. Common features of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2016;5:S240–1.
8.
Bronchoalveolar lavage constituents in healthy indi-viduals, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and selected comparison groups. The BAL Cooperative Group Steering Committee. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:169–202.
9.
Quanjer PhH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. European Respiratory Journal. 1993;6(Suppl 16):5–40.
10.
Mortaz E, Adcock IM, Ricciardolo FLM, Varahram M, Jamaati H, Velayati AA, et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Lactobacillus Rahmnosus and Bifidobacterium Breve on Cigarette Smoke Activated Human Macrophages. PLOS ONE. 10(8):e0136455.
11.
Petković TR, Pejčić T, Borovac DN. Disease activity markers in sarcoidosis. Acta Fac Med Naiss. 2011;28:155–9.
12.
Jamaati H, Mansoori S, Najafizadeh K. T-lym-phocyte subsets inbronchoalveolar lavage: a flow cytometric analysis and itsimportance in the differ-ential diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Arch IranMed. 2003;6:204–7.
13.
Petruccioli E, Chiacchio T, Pepponi I, Vanini V, Urso R, Cuzzi G, et al. Characterization of the CD4 and CD8 T-cell response in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus kit. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2016;5:S25–6.
14.
Ghamari E, Farnia P, Saif S, Marashian M, Ghanavi J, Tabarsi P, et al. Susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis: host genetic deficiency in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) gene and tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2). International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2016;5:S136–7.
15.
Chiacchio T, Petruccioli E, Pepponi I, Vanini V, Gualano G, Cirillo D, et al. Modulation of CD4 and CD8 response to QuantiFERON-TB Plus in patients with active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection followed over time during treatment. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2016;5:S141–2.
16.
Selimović A, Dinarević S, T P. Lymphocyte subsets in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of children with lung infiltrates. Acta Fac Med Naiss. 2012;29:139–44.
17.
Lj. T, O S, G N. Research on quality of life concept conducted at the Faculty of Medicine in Niš. Acta Fac Med Naiss. 2007;24:213–8.
18.
Filipović M, Živković Đ. Immunologic aspect of sarcoidosis. Acta Fac Med Naiss. 2001;18:229–34.
19.
Kahkouee S, Samadi K, Alai A, Abedini A, Rezaiian L. Serum ACE Level in Sarcoidosis Patients with Typical and Atypical HRCT Manifestation. Polish Journal of Radiology. 81:458–61.
20.
Mirsaeidi MS, Tabarsi P, Farnia P. Trends of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a ter-tiary tuberculosis center in Iran. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:544–50.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.