×
Home
Current Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article

The impact of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk assessment

By
Ivana Aleksić ,
Ivana Aleksić
Sonja Stojanović ,
Sonja Stojanović
Ivan Tasić ,
Ivan Tasić
Bojana Stamenković
Bojana Stamenković

Abstract

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a 1.5 times higher cardiovascular disease mortality compared to the general population, while the life expectancy of these patients is 5-10 years shorter compared to the general population. In RA patients, all stages of atherogenic process are accelerated. Systemic inflammation underlying RA is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases. The main objectives of the study were: a) to examine the lipid status and frequency of metabolic syndrome in RA patients and their association with disease activity and functional impairment; b) to assess the cardiovascular risk of RA patients in relation to disease activity and presence of metabolic syndrome components. Investigation was performed in RA patients diagnosed according to classification criteria the American Association of Rheumatologists (1987). All RA patients underwent clinical examination, laboratory analyses, measurement of blood pressure, body weight and height (body mass index was calculated). The presence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) was determined by the definition of the International Federation for Diabetes. ACC/AHA ASCVD risk calculator was used to calculate the cardiovascular risk. Disease activity was evaluated with DAS28 and CDAI score. Functional ability of patients was assessed based on the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Comparison of continuous variables was performed by the Mann-Whitney test, while comparison of the attributes was performed with the Chi-square test. Statistical data processing was performed in the program package R. The study enrolled 81 RA patients (19 men and 62 women) whose mean age was 59.7 ± 11.2 years, with average disease duration of 5.89 ± 6.25 years. According to disease activity measured by DAS28, all patients were divided into two groups - high disease activity group (HAD) with DAS28 > 5.1 which consisted of 37 patients (45.7%) and moderate, low disease activity and remission (MLA) group with DAS28 ≤ 5.1, which consisted of 44 patients (54.3%). The average total cholesterol level in all patients was 5.44 ± 1.03. Total cholesterol was 5.22 ± 1.03 in HAD group and 5.68 ± 1.03 in MLA group (p = 0.029). The average level of LDL cholesterol in all patients was 3.09 ± 0.80. In the HAD group, the levels were statistically significantly lower (p = 0.033) compared to the MLA group (2.84 ± 0.80 vs. 3.34 ± 0.80). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the study population was 54.3% (44/81 patients). Patients with metabolic syndrome had statistically significantly higher DAS28 values (p = 0.004), CDAI (p = 0.007) and higher functional incapacity determined by HAQ questionnaire (p = 0.001). Cardiovascular risk in the HAD group was 12.18 ± 8.09% which was higher compared to MLA group 10.74%, but without significance between the compared groups (p = 0.943). Cardiovascular risk was statistically significantly higher in patients with metabolic syndrome (p < 0.001). Our results suggest statistically significantly more frequent presence of metabolic syndrome in RA patients, which is accompanied with higher disease activity and more severe functional disability. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels were lower in patients with high disease activity. Cardiovascular risk was statistically significantly higher in patients with metabolic syndrome and RA, but without a significant difference regarding the disease activity.

References

1.
SITUNAYAKE RD, KITAS G. Dyslipidaemia and rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1997;56(6):341–2.
2.
Gabriel SE. Heart disease and rheumatoid arthritis: understanding the risks. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69:i61–4.
3.
Goodson NJ, Symmons DPM, Scott DGI, Bunn D, Lunt M, Silman AJ. Baseline levels of c‐reactive protein and prediction of death from cardiovascular disease in patients with inflammatory polyarthritis : A ten‐year followup study of a primary care–based inception cohort. Arthritis &amp; Rheumatism. 2005;52(8):2293–9.
4.
Aubry MC, Maradit-Kremers H, Reinalda MS. Differences in atherosclerotic coronary heart disease between subjects with and without rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:937–42.
5.
Doornum S, B K, C B. Mortality rates following a first acute cardiovascular event: a comparison between rheumatoid arthritis patients and the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:702.
6.
Douglas KMJ, Pace AV, Treharne GJ, Saratzis A, Nightingale P, Erb N, et al. Excess recurrent cardiac events in rheumatoid arthritis patients with acute coronary syndrome. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2006;65(3):348–53.
7.
Banks MJ, Pace A, Kitas GD. Acute coronary syndromes present atypically and recur more frequently in rheumatoid arthritis than matched controls [abstract. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(Suppl.):53.
8.
Peters MJL, Symmons DPM, McCarey D, Dijkmans BAC, Nicola P, Kvien TK, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69(2):325–31.
9.
Goodson N. Coronary artery disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2002;14(2):115–20.
10.
Fischer LM, Schlienger RG, Matter C, Jick H, Meier CR. Effect of rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus on the risk of First-Time acute myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2004;93(2):198–200.
11.
Solomon DH, Karlson EW, Rimm EB, Cannuscio CC, Mandl LA, Manson JE, et al. Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Women Diagnosed With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Circulation. 2003;107(9):1303–7.
12.
Hallajzadeh J, Safiri S, Mansournia MA, Khoramdad M, Izadi N, Almasi-Hashiani A, et al. Metabolic syndrome and its components among rheumatoid arthritis patients: A comprehensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 12(3):e0170361.
13.
Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Kloosterman JME, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Klungel OH, Porsius AJ, de Boer A. Drug-Induced Lipid Changes. Drug Safety. 2001;24(6):443–56.
14.
McMahon M, Grossman J, FitzGerald J, Dahlin‐Lee E, Wallace DJ, Thong BY, et al. Proinflammatory high‐density lipoprotein as a biomarker for atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis &amp; Rheumatism. 2006;54(8):2541–9.
15.
Choy E, Ganeshalingam K, Semb AG, Szekanecz Z, Nurmohamed M. Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: recent advances in the understanding of the pivotal role of inflammation, risk predictors and the impact of treatment. Rheumatology. 2014;53(12):2143–54.
16.
Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Evaluation and outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2011. p. 941-954.e1.
17.
Myasoedova E, Chandran A, Ilhan B, Major BT, Michet CJ, Matteson EL, et al. The role of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flare and cumulative burden of RA severity in the risk of cardiovascular disease. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;75(3):560–5.
18.
Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman M. Development of a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) for the infrastructure of standard clinical care. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23.
19.
Falgrone G, Zerkak D, Bauer C. How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23:235–8.
20.
Leeb BF. The patient’s perspective and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity indexes. Rheumatology. 44(3):360–5.
21.
Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk. Circulation. 2014;129(25_suppl_2).
22.
Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. The Lancet. 2005;365(9468):1415–28.
23.
Ward MM. Clinical and laboratory measures. 2004.
24.
Welsing PMJ, Van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, Kiemeney LALM, Van Riel PLCM. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis &amp; Rheumatism. 2001;44(9):2009–17.
25.
Bruce B, Fries JF. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):20.
26.
Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Outcome Measurement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Disease Activity. Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2009. p. 225–30.
27.
Bartoloni E, Alunno A, Bistoni O, Gerli R. How early is the atherosclerotic risk in rheumatoid arthritis? Autoimmunity Reviews. 2010;9(10):701–7.
28.
Arend WP. Physiology of cytokine pathways in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis &amp; Rheumatism. 2001;45(1):101–6.
29.
Kaplan MJ. Cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2006;18(3):289–97.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Citations

Crossref Logo

3

Crossref Logo

Wei Cai, Xuemi Tang, Min Pang

(2022)

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Medicine, 9()

10.3389/fmed.2022.855141

Crossref Logo

Gashaw Dessie, Gualtiero I. Colombo

(2022)

Association of atherogenic indices with C-reactive protein and risk factors to assess cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis patient at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa

PLOS ONE, 17(6)

10.1371/journal.pone.0269431

Crossref Logo

Maryam Jafari, Kishan Patel, Abinash Mahapatro, Bita Amirian, Casra Saeedi, Satabdi Sahu, Mohit Mirchandani, Herby Jeanty, Elan Mohanty, Nakka Raghuma, Saisree Reddy Adla Jala, Shika M Jain, Pavan Devulapally, Rahman Hameed Mohammed Abdul, Pegah Rashidian, Negin Letafatkar, Farahnaz Joukar, Forough Heidarzad, Mohammad-Javad Khosousi, Mohammad Amin Karimi, Seyyed Mohammad Hashemi, Ehsan Amini-Salehi

(2025)

Global prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Rheumatology, 9(1)

10.1186/s41927-025-00572-1

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.